Agenda

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL: Town Clerk Judith Beville

Present:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Staff Present:	Judith Beville, Town Clerk
	Timothy Lewis, Town Attorney

MOMENT OF SILENCE
Moment of Silence in memory of Myrna M. Ross, longtime resident of the Town of Greenburgh passed on June 15, 2018. Myrna, along with her husband, William Ross, moved to Greenburgh in 1974. She enjoyed over forty years of living in our town while “giving back” through her involvement in the Greenburgh Central School District as a teacher for many years as well as an adjunct professor at Bronx Community, Westchester Community, and Mercy Colleges. Having earned the distinct honor of “Teacher of the Year” by NYC School District 3, she held leadership roles in education as a trainer and mentor to newly hired educators as well as in her church and was a member of two distinguished and nationally renowned community service organizations with a primary focus on promoting high academic achievement and professional advancement: Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc. and Jack and Jill of America

PRESENTATION

Daniel Marshall, Irvington High School Senior, orginazed rally for immigration on June 20, 2018

Recognition of Amanda Tamas, Legislative Aide, for her outstanding work on various initiaives for multiple departments for the past 3 years. Amanda graduated from PACE Law School in May and is currently studying for the New York State Bar exam

SUPERVISOR & TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS

GOOD NEWS...The Town continues (since 2008) to have the highest possible bond rating from both Standard & Poors (AAA) and Moody's (Aaa). Less than 3% of communities in the nation have top ratings of financial stability. Recently (10/06/2017), Moody's once again reaffirmed the Town's highest rating and on (10/10/17) Standard & Poors reaffirmed the Town's highest rating.

Any individual or group interested in a visit from the Town Board should email the Board at TownBoard@GreenburghNY.com

TOWN CLERK COMMENTS

PUBLIC COMMENT

Advance signup is preferred. Speakers will be called in the order of receipt of a Public Comment Request Form. The forms are available on the Town Web site, in the Town Clerk’s Office (until 7:00 PM on the day of the meeting), and on the dais next to the Town Clerk during the meeting. A three minute limit per speaker will be strictly enforced. No interruptions by Town Board members, the Town Clerk or the public will be permitted. Any questions on agenda items should be asked at this time. Department Heads have the option of leaving the meeting following Public Comment. Therefore, if anyone has questions that are related to resolutions/items on the agenda that she/he would like to direct to a specific Department Head, those questions should be raised at this time.

DECISION

SUPERVISOR FEINER

Introduction of a Local Law to consider zoning text amendment to Section 285-25 of the Zoning Ordinance, entitled “OB Office Building District,” as it relates to fully enclosed commercial recreation uses

PUBLIC HEARINGS

STATE OF NEW YORK

TOWN OF GREENBURGH

-----------------------------------X

Public Hearings and Decisions Before

The Town Board of Greenburgh, New York, in

Connection with Various Applications in

Relation to the Town Ordinance of the

Town of Greenburgh.

------------------------------------x

June 27th, 2018 Greenburgh Town Hall

7:30 p.m. 177 Hillside Avenue

Greenburgh, New York

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS:

PAUL FEINER, SUPERVISOR

COUNCILMAN KEN JONES,

COUNCILWOMAN DIANA JUETTNER,

COUNCILMAN KEVIN MORGAN

COUNCILMAN FRANCIS SHEEHAN

STAFF MEMBERS:

Garrett Duquesne,

Commissioner of Department of Community

Development and Conservation

Tim Lewis, Esq.

Deputy Town Attorney

Judith Beville

Town Clerk

Susan Giampiccolo Official Court Reporter

To consider a Local Law amending Section 285-25 of the Zoning Ordinance entitled "OB Office Building District," as it relates to fully enclosed commercial recreation uses in the Town of Greenburgh

(Whereupon, at this time the roll call was taken.)

(Whereupon, at this time the Pledge of Allegiance

was led by Supervisor Feiner.)

(Whereupon, at this time there was a presentation

of Daniel Marshall, and a recognition of Amanda Tamas.)

SUPERVISOR FEINER: We're going to go to the first

public hearing. The first public hearing is to consider

Local Law amending Section 285-25 of the Zoning Ordinance

entitled "OB Office Building District", as it relates to

fully enclosed commercial recreation uses in the Town of

Greenburgh.

I move we open the hearing.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye.

MR. LEWIS: Well, You just have to formally

introduce that local law.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I'd like to formally introduce

that Local Law.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye.

MR. DUQUESNE: Good morning, Supervisor Feiner, and Members of the Town Board.

For the record, Garrett Duquesne, Commissioner of

the Department of Community Development and Conservation.

As this zoning text amendment was a subject of a

petition submitted by White Hickory Associates. They're

represented by Mr. Mark Weingarten. So, what I would like

to do process wise is turn it over to Mr. Weingarten for

presentation. And I'll be here later to walk you through

the Planning Board recommendation, and answer any questions

you may have.

Thank you.

MR. WEINGARTEN: Thank you, Commissioner.

Good evening, Mr. Supervisor, and Members of the

Board.

My name is Mark Weingarten. I'm a partner in the

law firm of DelBello, Donnellan, Weingarten, Wise &

Wiederkehr. And it's my pleasure to be here this evening

representing White Hickory Associates, LLC, in connection

with its petition to amend the Greenburgh Zoning Code

Section 285-64, pursuant to New York Town Laws Sections 264

and 265. I'm joined by my associate, Annie Klein.

In brief, the petition that we have before you

relates to the property owned by White Hickory, which is 600

White Plains Road. It is on the south side of White Plains

Road, also known as Route 119, near the intersection of

Benedict Avenue. That property is actually a commercial

condominium. It has two units. Made up of two units. One

is the Sheraton Hotel; a project that we worked very hard

with you some years ago to create. Over in that Office

Park, the Tarrytown Corporate Center, together with Unit

Two, which also was the subject of a project not too

recently with this Board, where it was built a Stop and Shop

Supermarket, approximately 53,000 square feet, and an

additional 26,000 square feet.

The project that we are talking about -- Again,

this is a petition that will impact all of the OB

properties, and we'll mention that in a moment -- is for an

Orange Theory Fitness Facility. It is a group personal

training workout facility. You go for a class. They have

60-minute workouts. It's a small studio. It's only 3500

square feet. If you are in the shopping center, looking at

the Stop and Shop, it's a small empty space to the left of

the supermarket; a vacant space, which we've been trying to tenant. And we're very excited about this tenant. It's a

great amenity for that particular center.

The use for Orange Theory would be classified as a

fully enclosed recreational facility. It would be

principally permitted in the LI Zone. It would specially

permitted in the IB, VS or the CA zone contained in your

codes.

Our proposal would amend the OB Zone in Section

285-25 (A) (1), to add fully enclosed recreational

facilities as a principle use for all facilities less than

5,000 square feet. In other words, small facilities. And

in 285-25 (A), a special permit use, which would have

additional conditions if it was greater than 5,000 square

feet.

The rationale that supports these changes are for

the entire district; not just for our particular property.

We believe that this change is consistent with your 2016

Comprehensive Plan. We also believe it is consistent with

the action items which were discussed at the Town Board and

Planning Board work session on November 29 of 2017. We

believe it protects your commercial tax base. It creates

amenities for the surrounding existing office tenants. It

enhances the appropriate mix of uses, and creates employment

opportunities.

In other words, as we've had this discussion in the

past, we know that our commercial base frankly is having

some issues in the office world. We tried to fill those

commercial uses with other things that might not have been

considered ten or 15 or 20 years ago. But people now want

to live differently, and they want their office parks to

have amenities. And clearly, a fitness facility is

something that fits in very well with the hotel and the

surrounding office in both our particular facilities, as

well as the other OB.

On June 20th, just a week ago, there was an

excellent report of the Planning Board, which analyzed all

the properties in the OB, and indicated why this would be a

use which would not only should work for our particular

site, but for all of the OB properties. And also went

through where it would be appropriate and would be likely to

potentially be utilized and where it would not. The

Planning Board also on that date issued unanimously a

positive recommendation supporting our petition.

So, that is in a nutshell where we are with this. And we would urge you to consider the adoption of these

changes.

Thank you.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: In your opinion, what parking

standards would be involved in the less than 5,000 square

feet?

MR. WEINGARTEN: We believe that the retail

parking -- that the retail parking that's provided there is

sufficient for the health club. Particularly, when you are

talking in the OB zone, where you again have less than 5,000

square feet. But these are large commercial office parks,

essentially, where the OB zone goes. You're going to have a

lot of shared parking, because the peaks are different. You

know health clubs, and these kinds of facilities; enclosed

recreational uses are typically used more at nights and on

the weekends when you have tremendous amount of parking

that's empty frankly in the office parks. So, we think it's

more than enough to utilize as we are with our particular

site; the existing number for the retail.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: What would stop a series of

below 5,000 square feet for being one right next to another,

one next to another, one next to another one, and basically

never make it to the Planning Board. What would be the

distinguishing characteristics? Different owners or

different renters?

MR. WEINGARTEN: Well, they would still make it to

the Planning Board if there was a site plan approval with

it. What you're saying is whether or not it would be a

special condition.

I would say a couple of things. First of all, I'm

not so sure that would be a bad thing. I actually have a

project in White Plains, which is getting off the ground

that's fully approved. That's a life-style center that does

have retail. And one of the things they are looking to do

is to take these smaller studios and put them near each

other. So that, if you want to cycle, there is a cycling

place. And if you want to go for yoga, there is a yoga

place. And have all of those things together. And then

where they don't have to have their own, for example, juice

bar, or you have separate retail facilities. And these are

the types of created uses that are coming out here. So

again, our commercial base is out there and supporting our

school and our taxes, and you know, etcetera that we're doing.

In the meantime as well, as I mentioned, if there

is a site plan, it would go in front of that board. And I

also don't know just -- I think the market would also

control just how many of these could be near each other and

function and have another enough customers to work.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: There was a very interesting

article in today's Wall Street Journal about the new look of

office parks. And basically, you know, with driverless cars

and technology, we don't really -- we're not going to really

need ten years from now or 20 years from now all these large

parking areas. And I think a lot of developers and owners

of these office parks want to reorganize the parks and make

it more of a village with housing, commercial, retail,

entertainment. You know, supermarkets. Something that

will, you know, really create more of a community. And I

that think this application really moves us in that

direction.

MR. WEINGARTEN: Slowly. I will tell you --

SUPERVISOR FEINER: But we really have to do

something because otherwise these office parks are just

going to be vacant.

MR. WEINGARTEN: I agree. And I can tell you that

has happened all throughout this region. Particularly to

give you examples, all along 287 were very involved. You

see places like Lifetime Fitness, which is a huge facility

for this is in an office park in Harrison where they're now

creating a Wegman Supermarket, like you put your Stop and

Shop.

So, people want to work in a place. They want to

be able to shop very close by. They want to be able to have

these amenities that are available. They don't want to just

drive to a place, park their car, and be isolated from

everything else. And that is what's selling now to the

tenants. And these mixed used areas are working, and this

is just another example of it.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: I'm still struggling with --

so in your opinion, there could be a whole series of these.

But it would be no additional parking requirement. It would

be based on whatever parking requirements was for the entire

center.

MR. WEINGARTEN: Correct. So, you'd still be

getting -- You still have a fairly significant -- I believe Greenburgh has -- I haven't looked at it recently -- three

to one; three per every thousand for the office. And I

believe for the retail it's five to one. So, you still --

For this it would be the retail parking. My memory is, if

I'm correct, this would be five --

MR. DUQUESNE: Five per thousand.

MR. WEINGARTEN: Five per thousand, which is the

same as retail. And your health club is 5.3. Is that a

stand alone facility here?

MR. DUQUESNE: Five per thousand.

MR. WEINGARTEN: It's the same. So, there is no

difference in the parking under your's. I'm confusing it

with White Plains that has a slightly higher for the health

clubs as a stand alone facility.

Again here, I particularly think it would be

something that you would come in and ask for potentially

even a variance if you didn't have the appropriate parking.

The shared parking here between an office park and a

healthcare is something that I believe strongly should -- It

works.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: So, I think you're saying

something different than what I interpreted you saying

earlier. You were saying there would be no additional

parking requirements for this recreational facility. It

would be based on whatever was existing for the park.

MR. WEINGARTEN: No. I apologize if you took that.

I was saying that we're utilizing the same parking as would

be there if it was any other kind of retail. Correct?

MR. DUQUESNE: Yes. If I could?

When I think about that question, I think that

question translates well if you think of it in the context

of the CA District, and you think about a -- let's say a

commercial strip plaza, and you had a series of let's say

5,000 square foot or less than 5,000 square foot in a fully

enclosed private recreational uses. I actually think that a

scenario such as that, the result would be you would free up

parking spaces. So, if I think of let's say a space that's

10,000 square feet that could facilitate four different

uses. If you had a yoga studio alongside a Taekwondo

establishment, alongside something like Orange Theory

Fitness, or something of that nature, I think actually that parking lot would have a lot less utilization than the

standard mix of restaurant, retail, you know, a bit of

office.

In the OB District, there happens to not be a great

amount of straight commercial. That use is allowed by

special permit only. And the only site in the OB District

of that nature is indeed the Stop and Shop site, which is

the desired location for the Orange Theory Fitness.

The analysis that the Planning Board ran through

that we assisted them on, we looked at all the OB areas.

And I'd be happy to go through them. But essentially what

was concluded when you go through each of the sites, you see

a lot of office buildings. And we tried to assign

probabilities of how this local law would impact them. And

what we saw was in most of the office buildings, there could

be a situation where a yoga studio, for instance, could

lease a portion of a floor of an office building. That's

the type of thing that we would expect, and that's the type

of anticipation that we would expect from this local law.

So, no change to the parking requirements.

I do want to clarify -- not clarify, but just make

it clear. With respect to the special permit aspect of

commercial rec's, those would be the bigger uses over 5,000

square feet. That parking standard would not change.

However, what's proposed in the local law is that as part in

addition to the general standards that one would have to

answer as part of their special permit application, there is

a specific standard that says prepare a parking utilization

summary with your application. And the thought there is

that if you have a large shopping center, and let's say it

has enough parking per code, but some of that parking is to

the rear of the center like ala Crossroads. Right? I think

we all know that parking lot to the rear of Crossroad

Shopping Center is not used at all. What we think that the

special permit condition would do is that in that instance

it would have the Planning Board take a closer look. And

despite maybe an applicant having enough parking on paper

and out in the field, it would give the Planning Board some

teeth, if you will, to may be look at ways to have that

applicant explore getting either patrons or workers to park

in the back there. So, it's really a little bit of extra

protection, if you will, to take a closer look at parking,

but for the larger sites.

We do feel that the sites less than 5,000 square

feet, in general, I think the thought is to be sort of

business friendly, for lack of a better term. You know, the smaller Taekwondo places, if they're faced with -- If they

want to be let's say lower Central Park Avenue, and they say

to themselves well, we have a great site in Greenburgh. We

also have a great site let's say in Yonkers. And if the

choice is, you know, two month or three month Planning Board

process, where we have to submit architectural plans and go

through a special permit process, that could be a $10,000.

If that cost doesn't exist in the neighboring community and

all other things are equal, I would imagine what the choice

would be there. So, I think that's why we're making I think

an important distinguishing trait between the 5,000 and

greater than 5,000.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: The other thing I think is sort

of interesting is if you look at the office parks right now,

they're so much under utilized. They're really not utilized

efficiently. After five p.m., you know, most of these parks

are empty. And we're not getting real value for the land.

So, if we could reconfigure some of these office parks so

they're actually become useable to the owners, and you know,

properties that people in the community can enjoy, I think

there is real benefits for the town. We don't want to see

all these vacant buildings and vacant storefronts, and we

want to a vibrant community. And I think this is something

that a lot of people will really enjoy.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: My question about parking

reform didn't mean that I don't want a lot of vacant stores.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: No. I'm not criticizing.

COUNCILMAN JONES: And if you drive up and down 119

even in the middle of the day passed some of these office

parks, and the parking lots aren't even anywhere near full

now. And it really is wonderful, I believe, that something

like this could happen to facilitate this type of growth in

these types of centers, because it is a lot of wasted space.

And the whole work play idea of development is I think is

the wave of the future, and I think we need to catch that

wave.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: What I'm trying to grapple

with is the 5,000 threshold now. Because we'll advocate for

4,500 square feet ten times. You don't get to the Planning

Board. But if you have one 6,000 square foot facility, you

go to the Planning Board. Why is that?

MR. WEINGARTEN: I understand what you're saying.

But the likelihood of that, if you take a look at where

these things are created. Orange Theory Fitness is right on Mamaroneck Avenue in White Plains. Are there other types of

recreation uses along Mamaroneck Avenue? There are some,

but they're not all going to locate there. They're only

going to locate if they're different. I mean, it would

be -- I think that there is just a limited number of people

that are in the office park. There is so much of that

you're going to have. There are different types of workout

places. The one that I'm talking about in White Plains, by

the way, which is designed to have the smaller studios are

from 500 to 1500 square feet, because they're very small.

They don't have their own locker rooms. They're just going

to be a very small place with very small rent. So they can

go ahead and open up, and they can all locate in one place

and have all the other amenities around it.

I wouldn't see something like that. Frankly, I

couldn't imagine anywhere -- that I could think of anywhere

in our region where something like that takes place. The

trend, by the way is for these monster places to open, like

the Lifetime Fitness, which is over 100,000 square feet.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: What would you think would be

the maximum number of these 5,000 or less near each other?

MR. WEINGARTEN: I can tell you in this particular

place one, because that's the only one that's left at the

moment.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: We're doing the whole

district, so we have to look broadly.

MR. WEINGARTEN: I have to tell you that size,

not -- I mean in White Plains, they designed it for I think

it's seven or eight of them. But again, it's a total of

probably ten or 12,500 feet for all of them. And they're

around a public area for people to sit at a table, and then

go to a juice bar and bring something. So again, it's

having the amenity space that these people don't have to pay

for. But it's not a big place.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Would anyone like to speak?

MS. PREISER: Ella Preiser.

Mark, I have no problem with what you are planning

for this Stop and Shop lot. I support it totally. I think

it should be as of right. You shouldn't have to go through

any laborious process before the Town. But I do have some

problem with the second provision that you are talking

about; the uses under special permit or special permit by the Planning Board.

But before I get to that, may I tell you that you

need to make one little correction in this document I picked

up out at the -- Under legislative findings and intent, it

refers to the OB-1 District. And I don't think -- There is

nothing else in here that references OB-1. So, I think you

ought to correct that.

Okay. Special permits. If anybody isn't aware,

the New York State enabling legislation identifies them as

uses that require as of right, provided you meet certain

conditions. Well, when you look at what you have here, what

is the condition that you are meeting. And the only

condition that you appear to be saying is that somehow or

other the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of

the Planning Board that adequate available peak time parking

exists. That's not a condition. That's more or less saying

we're going to waive any condition whatsoever. What

conditions are necessary for this. And right now those of

you who are familiar with the Zoning Ordinance will know

that you -- we already in this Town in the Zoning Ordinance

have a provision that indicates you can have shared parking

on a site where there are multiple uses that don't have the

same peak time and what have you. That already exists in

the Code.

And I want to tell you about something else too.

The provisions of our Zoning Ordinance are supposed to be

enforced by the building inspector. It says it right it in

the Code that he is the enforcement officer. What this

does, my personal opinion, is usurps the authority of the

building inspector and gives it to the Planning Board. And

I don't think you can do that unless you are willing to

To consider a Local Law amending Section 285-27 of the Zoning Ordinance,entitled "LOB Limited Office Building District," as it relates to fully enclosed commercial recreation uses and self-storage uses in the Town of Greenburgh (Held over to July 11, 2018 Town Board Meeting)

To consider a proposed increase and improvements of the facilities of the Town's Consolidated Water District consisting of various capital improvements to the facilities of the Consolidated Water District, including water storage tank rehabilitation, water main cleaning and lining, and a water main interconnection from Rumbrook to Knollwood Pump Station

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I'd like to consider a Local

Law amending Section 285-27 of the Zoning Ordinance.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: No, that was held over.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Okay. That was held over.

I'd like to consider a proposed increase and

improvements of the facilities of the Town's Consolidated

Water District consisting of various capital improvements to

the facilities of the Consolidated Water District, including

water storage tank rehabilitation, water main cleaning and

lining, and a water main interconnection from Rumbrook to

Knollwood Pump Station. I'd like to move that.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye.

MR. CAROSI: Hi. Good evening, Supervisor Feiner,

Members of the Town Board.

Victor Carosi, Commissioner of Public Works. I'm

here on behalf of the Consolidated Water District to talk to

you about the public hearing for a request to offer

approximately -- exactly 10.75 million dollars in bonding

for future water improvement infrastructure projects. It's

a lot of money. 10.75 million dollars.

As this Board knows, we've been on quite a mission

lately to reinvest into the infrastructure of the Water

District. It's an important aspect to do; to maintain the

quality and the efficiency of our water system. To provide

drinking water to our customers. It's a large district,

with over 130 miles of water pipe. We have six different

water tanks. We have two water pump stations. And it

requires a lot of infrastructure and improvement to keep the

system functioning.

We have before you a request for this 10.75

million. One of the projects of this bond offering is for a continued improvements of our water tanks. The District

operates six water tanks. Through the past approvals, we

have repaired three of those tanks. You might recall going

back to 2015 and 2016, we entered into a long term

contractual relationship with a company that for an upfront

cost we rehabilitate each tank, and then there are annual

payments for maintenance of those tanks going out to

approximately 20 years.

To date, we have done the first tank, which was in

Juniper Hills. That tank was completely rehabilitated;

interior and exterior painting and remodeling; a renovation

of it. We did the next tank was up of our Irvington tank

off of the Taxter Ridge Park area. And we also re coded,

because it's one of our newer tanks, the Glenville tank.

That tank luckily did not require as much renovation and

overhaul as some of our older tanks. We felt reinvesting

into to keeping the coding system in good shape was a

worthwhile investment.

Last time this Town Board authorized additional

funding. We are currently repairing our Birchwood tank.

Many people are aware of that tank and its condition. What

this is doing is continuing with that program. We're

looking at the Knollwood tank off of Chelsea Road at the end

of Mayfair Wood area. That tank we're looking for 2.75

million dollars to rehabilitate that tank. It's

approximately 400,000 gallons of storage. And built in

1927, it needs some improvement. So, one of the issues is

that bond offering for 2.75 million.

Another project that we are doing, and again it's

all in reinvestment that the Town has been doing for the

past couple of years is cleaning and lining water mains.

This is a great program, which we are actually saving money

for the Town by reinvesting, rehabilitating the water mains.

What happens with some water mains, especially older

mains -- I mentioned we have over 130 miles of water pipe in

the town. Years ago they did not have a lining. So, you

have cast iron that's been exposed to water. Through the

years it tends to develop a scale inside, which reduces the

ability of water to flow freely through that pipe. It also

introduces the possibility for discoloration within the

waters. Sometimes you might have brown water coming out

occasionally during certain peak periods.

Instead of replacing all of this water pipe, there

is a program where you can actually scrape the inside of

these pipes clean and insert a new lining into it. It's a

way of rehabilitating of mains, because most of the mains are in pretty good condition other than the interior of

them. So, by reinvesting we're actually saving. We did

some math, just to kind of let you know. When we do a

cleaning and lining project, we're spending roughly $180 or

so per foot, compared to recently when we replaced water

mains up in Chelsea, which we needed to do because we needed

actually larger pipes, that project came up over $470 per

foot. So, there is a huge difference between actually --

And of course, everybody knows the difference between small

little excavation that you might have seen being done in

some roads right now where it's a very noninvasive technique

versus ripping up an entire roadway.

So, cleaning and lining is something that we're

embarking in. We are asking for three-million dollars. And

this would be more of an annual reinvestment of the Town

back into the water infrastructure. Again, talking about

130 miles of a pipe. With the three-million dollars we're

able to do probably three or four miles of pipe each year.

Do the math. It's a considerable investment for a very,

very long-term type of project. By the time we got through

our entire system it's 20 or 30 years out. But this is a

way we can again reinvest and keep those pipes that people

invested in many years ago. And with the lining inside of

them they should last much, much longer.

Then the last project that we've got before you,

we've talked about the underpasses; the interconnection.

Talked about our water pump station. We do have two pump

stations. So, one of them is 1950's vintage or so. The

other one was built around the turn of the -- Around 1990's,

1995 or so. What we're trying to do now is install a large

diameter transmission meter. Approximately 30 inches in

diameter that would allow us to interconnect those two

sources of water, which also happen to offer from New York

City's reservoir system two different interconnections to

the aqueduct system of New York. The benefit there is if

there is a problem at one pump station, we're able to have a

secondary source. So, this interconnection is a vital part

of the Town's infrastructure, providing an opportunity for

us to have two sources of water, and have the opportunity to

utilize one pump station should the other fail in some sort

of way.

In the past the Town authorized up to six-million

dollars of borrowing. A firm, an engineering firm; Arcadis,

has been under contract for the Town, has been working on

the design of that water main; water transmission main. The

cost estimate is between 8.3 and 11 million dollars for

nearly 6200 linear feet of 30-inch pipe. It's a pretty ambitious project. So, what we're seeking now is

authorization to bond up to an additional

five-million dollars, which would bring us with an

authorization to the top range of the engineer's estimate of

the project of 11-million dollars. We may need that full

five-million dollars at this point.

The project is nearing 90 to 91st percent

completion on the design end. We hope to be going out to

bid with that probably before the end of this year. Once we

get those final bid numbers in, we will know whether or not

we should be seeking the full 11-million dollars. Hence,

another five-million dollar request, or if we might be able

to pair that down a little bit. But the bond offering is up

to five-million dollars. And I just want to make that

clear, because we don't want to borrow it if we don't need

to. But based upon the construction cost estimates from our

engineers, we may have that need. So, we're going to

utilize the opportunity to do the bidding. And then if we

need to, we'll go out to the market.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Can I just ask you a question

about the bidding?

MR. CAROSI: Yes.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I remember years ago if we

don't -- if we borrow and we don't use it, we still have to

pay off the bond.

Could we possibly change the wording to give us a

little bit more flexibility. So, if we know we're going to

have a millions of dollars of expenses, and if we don't use

it for this, then we don't have to --

MR. CAROSI: Exactly. The bond offering is

structured in that exact method. We're using the words up

to, to give us that flexibility.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: So, we're going to be bonding

up to. What happens if we issue the bond. And then do we

issue the bond before we go out to bid or after?

MR. CAROSI: In this particular case, the Town

Board had authorized -- previously authorized spending of

six-million dollars. What we would like to do is actually

get the bids in. The six-million dollars would offer us

enough cushion to actually start the contract, and then

probably go out to market and get the difference that's

necessary. So, I think that's the way we can save the Town some money going forward. We'll work on that as it gets a

little closer, and we'll work with our engineers and bond

counsel. But the wording that we are currently are offering

is up to, to offer that flexibility.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: As I understand it, what we're

doing is authorizing the ability to go to bond. We're not

actually going to bond. That determination will be made at

the appropriate time, based upon what figures we have and

what the need is.

MR. CAROSI: Exactly. This whole public hearing,

it's the bond. It's a bond offering. It's simply seeking

permission to understand that the Town has the authority to

do so. It doesn't automatically say we're going out to

market tomorrow.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: The supervisor is correct, we

don't want to go get a bond for things that we are not going

to spend, because that's not wise.

MR. CAROSI: Exactly. There are some laws that

would be important to keep in mind at that point too.

That's it in a nutshell. I don't want to really

belabor this point. We've talked about it. But I'm very

much happy to answer any questions that people might have.

I will also let you know as far as this bonding, we

also understand that bonding comes with costs. Just last

night we had another meeting with the Water Advisory

Committee. I want to let everybody know, I think it's a

great public opportunity to know that our Water Advisory

Committee I think it's nine or 10 or 11 members or so. We

have a very solid group of residents that are constantly

looking at the finances of the Water District. Because we

want to make sure that our ambitious infrastructure

initiatives and the corresponding bonding are still making

water to be affordable.

So, it's a very delicate balance, because we need

to improve and invest in the system. But at the same time

we can't make water too valuable a commodity that it becomes

unattainable, unaffordable for most people. So, they've

always been very careful to look at what impacts these types

of bonding has. And as such, we've been doing long-term

financial planning. There is going to be continued rate

increases. It looks like from our financial modeling that

those rate increase is will not be -- well, any rate

increases is significant. But some of the numbers we're looking at preliminarily might be in the four-and-half

percent or five percent range, which would support this

bonding as well as future bonding initiatives going off into

the future.

So, I just want to kind of lay that out. I expect

that within the next two months or so that the Water

Advisory Committee will be in a position to make some

recommendations on future changes in the rate structure.

All right. If there any questions from the board

members, or if you want to open it up to the public.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Does the public have any

comments?

MS. BEVILLE: Ella Preiser.

MR. CAROSI: Thank you.

MS. PREISER: Ella Preiser.

Victor, you indicated that there is one thing going

forward, and that's the cleaning up pipes, and what have

you. But this is a huge amount of money you are asking for

right now.

Do we have any big projects in the future or we'll

be caught up to date. I know we've let maintenance go for

too many years. At some point, you do find it catches up to

you. What is the future hold for us regarding cost?

MR. CAROSI: Sure. So, as I was talking about

continuing projects and the need for reinvestment -- I

should say infrastructure reinvestment, cleaning lining is

one of the projects I talked about looking for a

three-million dollar project here.

We currently have underway about 16,800 feet of

water main cleaning and lining. If anybody drives up

Knollwood Road, you'll see some work going on there.

Whitewood, Hartford, turning onto the top part of Payne, and

going down a little bit on Lawrence. We have a number of

projects there totalling about 16,850 feet.

Moving on, we have already looked into two other

projects going into 20 -- possibly earlier as later this

Fall, and then going into 2019. Where we'll have another

three-and-a-half miles; another 3.8 miles of pipe. We're

also going to continue focusing on Knollwood Road, Grasslands Road, Taylor, Oxridge. We have some

infrastructure in those areas. What we're trying to do is

make sure that there is water mains are able to move water

between our water tanks. Right now we have a little bit of

a bottle neck of the system up in the northwest portion of

our community. And what we're trying to do through these

projects focusing over there is having a good flow of the

water from the Knollwood tank, across through underneath the

Sprain, and underneath 9A, and back up over onto our other

infrastructure up off Taxter.

So, it's definitely projects we have planned. And

then we have other projects talking over into Old White

Plains area; Watchhill, Taxter, Mulligan. Again focusing

around from our water tanks.

Also should be noted these cleaning and lining

projects, we also had an opportunity last year through a

grant opportunity, through the New York State -- It was part

of the Clean Water Infrastructure Act of 2017. It was

apparently 2.5 billion dollars of water were allocated for

clean water projects. The Town had applied for these

projects at the time as part the clean water imitatives, and

were awarded a grant of approximately 4.7 million dollars;

4.8 million to help offset some of these costs. What we are

planning on doing with that money -- This money is always

reimbursement. So, you have to spend it and you get it

reimbursed back. But because we have long term and

long-term commitments, as we get that money in, it will

reimburse us for some of these costs, and some of the

reductional costs will roll over to future projects.

So, overall this whole idea of cleaning and lining,

we want to keep doing year after year after year to improve

the hydraulics throughout our entire district to make sure

that our pumps able to work efficiently to push water

through those pipes. Sort of like arteries in a heart. You

want to make sure things flow clean. So, it's kind of the

same analogy for the Water District. So, this is something

we're doing. And to make sure our infrastructure is able to

provide fire flow when needed, and able to provide the peaks

that we need and have limited instances of discoloration of

water.

So, it's an annual reinvestment that we anticipate

at about three-million dollars a year. And that

three-million dollars, by the way, was a number that our

consultants talking to suggested as what we call a sweet

spot for this business. There are only a limited number of

contractors in the cleaning and lining business throughout the country. And what you look at is trying to figure out

where it is from a dollars and cents prospective, because

they have to load out a tremendous amount of equipment. So,

there is an amount which becomes most efficient. And it's

through numerous projects that are consultants have advised

us this is approximately good value. And doing things at

around three miles, three-and-a-half miles, 3.8 miles worth

of infrastructure improvement seems to give us the best

dollar return on that project. So, that's why we chose

that.

And again, what we're trying to do in the future is

keep this type of spending. We're also looking at ways that

our water rates might be able to support some of a return so

we don't have to keep bonding. So, I want to give a big

picture of where we're going.

MR. LEWIS: Mr. Zinger.

MR. ZINGER: Hello. Eric Zinger.

Victor, those last comments, that's was what I king

of wanted to address. I was just curious. I know we did

receive 4.7 million from the State. And it sounds, and just

reading based on the grant and you know, the public hearing

that was done on May 10th in 2017, regarding this, and then

the proposed document here, it reads without -- it doesn't

go into some of the specifics, but it reads this is like the

same work that we got the grant for.

And then what struck me -- I kind of perked up at

the last minute is when you said that we may not be using

the proceeds from this bond to pay for the work described

because we're going to gets reimbursed from the State for

it, and kind of use it to ease the cash flow. Maybe I

misheard. Can you clarify that most recent point? Because

I was under the impression just the same sections; Knollwood

Road, Taxter Road. It looked like we got at least --

MR. CAROSI: 4.7.

MR. ZINGER: 4.7 million for an estimated 7.6

million project of those two areas. It was totalling

applied for 11.2.

Now we're asking for ten-million dollars more. It

would seem like we had received grant money to cover this.

Maybe you can just clarify that. MR. CAROSI: Any other questions?

MR. ZINGER: Well, it depends on how we're going to

answer that question, to be hones.

MR. LEWIS: We're trying to get all the questions

out at one time.

MR. ZINGER: Well, then my question is specifically

related to the cleaning of the road. I have questions about

the pipeline, in terms of how often this is expected to be

done, what the anticipated -- I know we don't have the bond

specifics here. But the date of the bond, how long the bond

would be for, and how long the cleaning would be good for.

Do those overlap? Are we looking to maximize from a

financing and intrastate standpoint, the length of the bond?

Or is it more correlated so that the bonds come due when

additional work is required. I had a question about that.

And then I also have a question relates to the

bonding. You know, where this stands in terms of any bonds

that are falling off, and how we anticipate this potential

bond, which you know, was a significant amount of money, but

it's all relative. How we anticipate it potentially

impacting water rates, and you know, how that would effect

if we're anticipating that would cause water rates to go up;

no changes. How that relates to the whole financing

structure of the Water District?

MR. CAROSI: Sure. All right. So, the first

question talked about, as I did mention the grant that we

did receive, and how we're going to be applying that grant.

As I said, the grants are reimbursements. We do have to put

the money up front. So, there has to be a way to finance

these projects initially.

Because these projects of cleaning and lining are

going to continue into the future, as we do a project, we

receive bond proceeds. If there is the reimbursement coming

back from the grant, they're will obviously be a certain

cash flow. That cash flow then would be reinvested back

into future cleaning and lining projects. So, it's a matter

of right now balancing the money. However, if grants come

in earlier and there is not a need to fully bond, obviously

we won't do that. Again, remember these bond issues are

requests. They're not an automatic go out to the bank

tomorrow. So, there is a certain amount of flexibility with

the bonding, and it's really in timing as far as the grant

monies and when they come in.

But the bigger picture of this is yes, we did receive a grant for 4.7. Yes, we have said to the State

that there is at least 7.7 million dollars of project. And

yes, in the future we're going to continue to improve our

infrastructure with additional cleaning and lining projects

that have not yet been identified. But from a long term

modeling and understanding of our system, we definitely have

future work to do. Again 130 miles of pipe. We're just

addressing approximately ten miles of it with this

infrastructure grant.

So, there is an awful lot of going forward into the

future, and it's a matter of working with the grants and

with the bonding, and making sure we have the financing that

we need to go forward today and into the future.

How this all works out. You mentioned the 10.7.

That's a bond issue in aggregate; the 10.75 million. That's

not specific to the cleaning and lining that we were talking

about which we're seeking in this particular offering

approximately -- exactly it's three-million dollars.

How all this plays into the Water Department.

First off, cleaning and lining is a project that has

probably 00-year life span. It's taking a Portland cement

mortar, and installing it in a spin cast process into the

inside of the water mains. We're choosing water mains

To consider a Local Law amending the Code of the Town of Greenburgh to establish signage requirements pertaining to specified land-use related applications in an effort to ensure broader public participation.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I'd next like to consider Local

Law amending the Code of the Town of Greenburgh to establish

Signage requirements pertaining to specified land-use

related applications in an effort to ensure broader public

participation.

I'd like to move to open the hearing.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye.

MR. DUQUESNE: Good evening, Supervisor Feiner, and

Members of the Town Board.

For the record, Garrett Duquesne, Commissioner of

the Department of Community Development and Conservation.

This is a continuation of a public hearing. And at

the first public hearing, we heard some excellent comments

related to the proposed local law which would have a sign

such as you see here on the screen, placed at the location

of potential land use applications.

At the last public hearing, a comment was made that

such a sign should also be incorporated into applications

made before the Antenna Review Board. And that is something

that the local law has been amended to incorporate that.

In addition, there were some questions about the

actual placement of a local law, as it was proposed in

Chapter 285 Zoning. And as a result of that, with the

assistance of Councilman Sheehan, and actually working with

Miss Preiser, who made the comment, I think that the local

law is improved, and there has been some reformatting simply

from a placement in the code prospective.

Having said that, I'm happy to answer any questions

and hear from the public. Thank you.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Would anybody like to speak?

MS. BEVILLE: Ella Preiser.

MS. PREISER: Ella Preiser.

I just want to say thank you to Garrett and to Mr.

Sheehan for this need to get this obstructionist. I am

grateful that you made the changes. But I just picked up a

copy before out there, and may I tell you about two little

things on the first page of this that you have.

You do know I'm a nitpicker, and words have

meaning. In the very beginning of this on the top of the

page, the introduction that says a local law amending. Part

Four of the Code of the Town of Greenburgh entitled

Administration and amending Article Six. Instead of saying

of the Code, it should say of the Zoning Ordinance of the

Town of Greenburgh. There are Article Six's all over

throughout the code. So, you should include that.

And then go down into Section Number One, entitled

Title. It just makes references to public hearing Signage

requirements. The Antenna one is not just hearing public

hearings. It has to do with meetings too. I don't know

whether you want to do hearings/meetings or what. But just

so that we have accurate files in the future.

And again, I thank Garrett and Francis.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Anybody else?

Then I'd like to move to close the hearing and

leave the record open for seven day.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye. * * *

To invite public comment on the Town of Greenburgh's proposed Community Development Block Grant applications to be submitted through the Westchester Urban County Consortium (See Resolutions PH 1, PH 2, PH 3 and PH 4)

SUPERVISOR FEINER: The next is to invite public

comment on the Town of Greenburgh's proposed Community

Development Block Grant applications to be submitted through

the Westchester Urban County Consortium.

I'd like to move that.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Do you want to open the

hearing?

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I'd like to move that we open

the hearing.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye.

MR. DUQUESNE: Good evening, Supervisor Feiner, and

members of the Town Board.

For the record, Garrett Duquesne, Commissioner of

the Department of Community Development and Conservation.

We're here to present for you four community

development block grant applications. The first of which I

will present, and then Winsome Gordon will present the

remaining three. And following that, we have two additional

projects from nonprofit organizations in the town of

Greenburgh.

This public hearing is related to the Town of

Greenburgh's intent to submit community development block

grant application through Westchester County, as we are now

part of the Westchester County Consortium, for sidewalk

projects spanning portions of Old Tarrytown Road, Manhattan

Avenue and Knollwood Road.

On the overhead map there, we have the proposed

route of the sidewalk. And again, this is the same

application that was submitted last year, which we were unfortunately unsuccessful in getting. However, I do feel

that the support of the County, our application will be

stronger, and I'm confident that we will put forth a great

application. So, this will sound familiar.

But on the overhead there, there is the route of

the proposed project. And in yellow is the proposed

sidewalks. Noteworthy is that in each of those locations

shown as yellow on Old Tarrytown Road, Manhattan Avenue and

Knollwood Road, there is an actual sidewalk gap. There are

no sidewalks. So, residents are forced to walk on the side

of the road in the shoulder, which obviously is not a great

scenario.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Can you also in your

presentation say how much you are asking for each of the

projects?

MR. DUQUESNE: Absolutely.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: And what the match is.

MR. DUQUESNE: Certainly.

With regard to the project budget, the cost

estimate, and this is the entire project, is $548,000. What

is being applied for is a $250,000 grant through the

Community Development Block Grant. And the remaining

$300,000 is actually allocated already. The Town of

Greenburgh by resolution last year authorized a $50,000

supplement for this project. In addition, the State Aid and

Municipal Grant Program through Assemblyman Abinanti, we are

process there, and that's going well. I feel like that

process is nearing its conclusion, where I feel very soon

there will be $250,000 allocated, which will supplement the

project as well. So, that will bring the $550,000 total

project budget and covering the project.

And the cost estimate prepared by engineering was

done in a conservative manner. We have the support of

engineering who will actually be designing this project.

The intent would be to use an independent surveyor and

actually design the sidewalk inhouse.

Presently residents in the area, employees at local

businesses and visitors to the area, again walk on the

unapproved shoulder. What this sidewalk would do as far as

connections, it would provide access to several important

destinations, such as the Greenburgh Public Library, the

Theodore Young Center, Old Tarrytown Road Parklet, Greenburgh Town Hall, and several places of worship in the

Route 119 mixed use corridor.

I think also noteworthy is the study that's been

undertaken under the guidance of the Department of Public

Works for pedestrian safety on Old Tarrytown Road, obviously

this compliments that well. Part of that study concluded

that the actual width of Old Tarrytown Road is such that it

really promotes cars traveling faster; right? So,

essentially the sidewalk, which in many instances, will be

placed more into the actual roadbed because of that extra

width with a new curb. Will actually benefit the area from

a traffic safety prospective. It should serve as a traffic

calming function.

I know the Town Board has supported the sidewalk

through capital budget. And again, as I mentioned the Town

Board has already supported this with a $50,000 match. So,

your continued support for pedestrian safety is much

appreciated. I think this is an excellent project, and

really excited if this is ultimately funded through this

program. If it is funded, I think we would find out later

in the Fall. If that's the case, and if that is the case,

the goal would absolutely be to build this project out some

time next year.

Thank you.

MS. GORDON: Thank you so much, Commissioner

Duquesne.

I'm Winsome Gordon, Grants Coordinator, for the

record.

Honorable Supervisor Feiner, Honorable Members of

the Town Board, Councilwoman Diana Juettner, Councilman

Francis Sheehan, Councilman Kevin Morgan, and Council Ken

Jones, Liason to the Community Development Block Grant.

I'm Winsome Gordon. I'm the Grant Coordinator, and

I coordinate the grants for the Town of Greenburgh. I would

like to take this opportunity to thank each and every one

for attending this public hearing.

The Town of Greenburgh prepares Community

Development Block Grant applications after soliciting input

from citizens, neighborhood association, and various

agencies. The Town has about a series of projects designed

to address the needs of low and moderate income families,

and the priorities established by Westchester County, which are the development and maintenance of affordable housing,

sustainable investment and opportunities for youth.

As I mentioned, the Town of Greenburgh has four

projects. And he explained beautifully the sidewalk

project, which the community supports 100 percent.

The next project we have is a 20 passenger bus for

the Theodore D. Young Community Center for the seniors. The

cost of the bus is $76,000, and we're applying for $38,000

in Community Development Block Grant funding, and the Town

will match the other $38,000.

I must mention that the Town was able to secure a

16-passenger handicap accessible bus for our seniors, and

that was quite a remarkable thing for the town because we

have so many seniors who are stuck at home and they're in

need of transportation. So, getting this bus is going to

help us because now we're getting another bus so we can have

more services for our seniors and for our youth.

Now, as you all know, the community center has

numerous --

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: I'm sorry. There was a motion

for a 20-passenger bus be handicap accessible.

MS. GORDON: This one isn't. Thank you, Francis.

It's not supposed to be. What happened is that the

bus we got before was handicapped accessible, because we

needed it. Many of our seniors needed that. But we also

have seniors who don't need the handicap accessible, and

they're pretty mobile. So, we needed another bus to augment

our programming. So, I really appreciate that, councilman

Sheehan. So, this bus will not be handicap accessible.

COUNCILMAN JONES: We do have one that is handicap

accessible?

MS. GORDON: Yes, we do. The Town was able to

secure that. So, that shows commitment to the community and

to our seniors that the town was able to go out and get a

handicap accessible bus to benefit the community.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Why wouldn't we try to get our

vehicles so that you don't have to call a specific bus. In

particular, when you say there's so man seniors that are

handicapped. MS. GORDON: Well, what it is this. The existing

bus makes trips. But it takes people who are not disabled.

They need another bus, because they're using the bus for

people who are disabled and people who are not. So, having

this bus that's not handicap accessible allows them to take

the students and the seniors that are fairly mobile. And

we're going to require they put a low step on the bus. So,

that someone who -- seniors can get on it still.

There is a reason why we're not getting a handicap

accessible bus, because we lose four seats in the bus.

That's why. And there is a great need for servicing as many

people as possible. But we could add it to, Councilman

Sheehan. We can add it as accessibility, if you'd like

that. It can be done. It's not too late.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: I just don't believe that

separating people. I don't think we should have a bus for

the handicap and a bus for able bodies. If we have the

capability, I don't see why you can't have able bodies and

those that have a disability get on the same bus. You know,

the city buses are handicap accessible, and able body people

ride them just as well as the people who are handicap. I

just don't like the idea that okay here comes the handicap

bus.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I think I agree with you,

because I think that --

MS. GORDON: Okay.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: What was that?

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I do agree with you.

I feel that there maybe programs, and if we know

that most of the people are not disabled, but maybe somebody

is slightly disabled, they're going to be less inclined to

want to go on the program.

I think tomorrow we have some of the interns going

on one of the buses. They're going to be, as part of their

project, to look to press New York State to repave some of

the State roads. And we have two disabled students who are

part of our intern program. I think we're using the bus

with the lift; right?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Yes, we are.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: And I think that's really great. They really were so thrilled that they're able to

participate in the tour.

COUNCILMAN JONES: Can we get a larger bus that's

handicap accessible, so we don't lose the four seats?

MS. GORDON: Yes, I have you here. You are the

decision makers. Why don't I go for a larger bus?

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: See the cost.

MS. GORDON: Because it's a 50/50 match. So, let's

go for a larger bus. I can still make changes.

COUNCILMAN JONES: Unless the deputy commissioner

has an issue with that.

MS. GORDON: When I finish, I'm going to let him

speak.

Supervisor and Councilman Sheehan --

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Does that change if you get

a larger bus? Does that change the kind of license that you

need to drive it? Is that what you are concerned with?

MS. GORDON: I really appreciate the interjection.

I appreciate it so much because yes, they need more buses.

It will service more people. I thank both of you gentlemen

for that comment. And I will make sure I revise the

application to include a larger bus.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Great.

MS. GORDON: Thank you.

As I mentioned, this bus will augment outreach and

foster greater utilization of the community center resources

for both our youth and our seniors. And a little later on

I'm going to have the commissioner or deputy commissioner

come and do a speech about the bus.

Now the next project is Greenburgh Parks and

Recreation Kiddieland playground replacement, in Washington

Avenue Park.

This project cost $90,000, and we're applying for

$45,000 from Community Development Block Grant.

This parklet is located on 2.06 acres of land in the Town of Greenburgh. The playground equipment here is

greatly in need of replacement. The park services a low to

moderate income population. The park is accessed by people

who live at the Greenburgh Housing Authority, who live on

Manhattan Avenue, and in the neighboring Fairview Greenburgh

Avenue.

The Department of Parks and Recreation -- And I

must state Jerry Burns is passionate about this project,

because we spoke many times. He wants to upgrade this

playground. He wants to replace the furnishings, put new

grills in. He wants to replace the basketball courts. And

this will enhance the appearance of the park for the

surrounding community.

The next project is for the Community Center, and

that is replacing the upstairs lockers and upgrading the

locker rooms.

The cost of the project is $16,000. We're applying

for $8,000.

They want to replace the lockers in the female and

male locker rooms upstairs. Also upgrade the benches,

stalls, and maybe replace the toilets. This locker room has

outlived its use for life. And as I said, this locker room,

it really is a critical place; a critical roll in enhancing

programming.

A lot of people don't know this, but a community

center is a shelter. During the time of storm, blizzards,

hurricanes, they're there. It's a warming center. So,

these locker rooms have showers in there. They have

bathrooms in there. And they're handicap accessible. So,

there is a definite need to upgrade this, because we have

people calling from Ardsley. There was an emergency a

couple of months ago and somebody called and needed to use

the community center. The center is there for everyone. It

will not turn anyone away.

The next two projects we have are nonprofit

organizations. I'm telling you --

MR. DUQUESNE: Process wise.

MS. GORDON: Okay. So, why don't we ask Terrence

to come forward and talk about the two projects, and then

we'll have Jerry Burns. Thank you so much, Commissioner Duquesne.

MR. JACKSON: Greetings.

Terrence Jackson, Deputy Commissioner, Department

of Community Resources.

Excuse my attire this evening. We were finishing

our orientation for our summer camp. It was great. Lots of

fun had. Lots of learning. And my team won in kickball.

I'm very happy that we talk about buses this

evening, because we had a slight situation going on.

Recently bus 116 was taken out of service. It was an older

bus. That it had shock issues, and things like that. That

bus was basically held at the Parks and Recreation at

Anthony Veterans Park. That was one of two buses that was

used pretty much daily there. So, it was one that went out

of the fleet.

During this Summertime, the bigger bus is not

needed as much there. So, we gave over bus 129. That bus

the other day had to be put in for service. I'm playing a

shell game here, and it's getting tough. Then when you add

in the situation of handicap accessible, that makes it a lot

more difficult.

I agree, and it is definite for the number of

different programs that we do, it should not be a handicap

or non handicap accessible. If we're moving forward for new

buses, I believe we should do what we can to always have a

handicap accessible bus. But that does cut out on numbers

of seats. So, I would push for slightly a larger bus. Bus

116 was a 24 passenger. That was used for Parks and Rec.

That is something I need to replace definitely at that

number or higher. And if it was handicap accessible, that

would be wonderful.

We have done numerous -- You know, we are

transportation, and we do what we can. We helped the nature

center, and Margaret all the time with services there,

running children from schools back to the city, back to the

nature center to seek programming there. We are, as was

said, helping with a project tomorrow in looking for a grant

for filling potholes and all. A lot of things that are

going on, and the numerous buses are helpful. But again

with our aging fleet, it's making it tougher to meet those

demands.

What has been talked about and a grant like that would be wonderful. I'd love for more to come about.

Thank you.

MS. GORDON: The locker rooms.

MR. JACKSON: The locker rooms. Thank you.

Another great event. That is very true. And you

bring up an extremely great point with us being a shelter.

Whether it is just a warming center or we are truly

activated as a 24-hour shelter through CERT. The locker

rooms are not at the best state as they could be. In being

totally handicap accessible, locker rooms, they could be

better. The standards have gone up.

As far as the proper railings in the bathrooms and

things like that, definitely need it. Is a dated room that

really needs some love.

COUNCILMAN JONES: Both locker rooms or just one?

MR. JACKSON: Both upstairs locker rooms; female

and male. We did downstairs, and it made an incredible

improvement. But a lot of times they're using upstairs a

little bit more. It's a little more out of the way and

secluded from other kids running around as much and all.

The kids usually use the downstairs because those are able

for their parents to help them a little bit more. So, the

upstairs ones.

And in the sense of a situation where CERT does

come in, the rooms upstairs are broken up between male,

female and family. So, those are the bathrooms that would

be used mostly in that situation. So, it would be very,

very helpful.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I also just want to again thank

you for making the buses available tomorrow. It's really a

very exciting internship initiative. The students are going

to be taking a tour of the state roads, and they're going to

be taking pictures of pot holes, because the last time New

York State repaved a town road -- a state road within the

town; whether it's Central Avenue, Dobbs Ferry Road, Saw

Mill River Road -- there's a whole bunch of roads.

Hillside, Knollwood, Grasslands Road was over three years

ago. And some of the roads look like they were in the moon

or mars; rather than a road. They're going to be waving a

really aggressive lobbying effort to try to press the State

to recognize the importance of making these roads more passable and less dangerous.

I should mention that the County just settled a

lawsuit for like over three-million dollars because the

bicyclist went over a pothole and died. And I think wasn't

it like a three-and-a-half million dollar lawsuit

settlement. So, it's costly if we don't address

infrastructure, and New York State is definitely not

addressing the infrastructure. And the students are going

to be organizing this lobbying effort.

So, thank you for your participation.

MR. JACKSON: Always there to help. Thank you very

much.

COUNCILMAN JONES: I just wanted to ask, Winsome,

in the application for the funds to upgrade the locker

rooms, do they ask you for the types of upgrade that are

necessary?

MS. GORDON: They don't ask, but I will provide the

types of upgrade.

COUNCILMAN JONES: I can tell you from personal

experience -- My wife is an avid swimmer, and uses the

community center and the locker rooms very often. And two

things.

One is that there are no hooks to hang a towel. No

shelves to put a bottle of shampoo or soap. And the lockers

are so dangerous that one can reach into them, slash one's

wrist and need stitches.

MS. GORDON: Thank you so much for that.

COUNCILMAN JONES: You are very welcome.

MS. GORDON: Much appreciated. I will mention that

in the narrative.

COUNCILMAN JONES: I thought you might.

MS. GORDON: And recommendations. Thank you so

much.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: I think we need to do

something immediately to prevent that from happening. It's

a public record. We now know it's a very dangerous

situation. Maybe we can do a temporary fix. MS. GORDON: I will now call Jerry Burns,

Commissioner of Parks and Recreation.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: You'll follow up on Councilman

Sheehan's suggestion and see if we could address some of the

temporary -- at least temporary solutions to the locker room

problems.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: It wasn't a suggestion.

MR. JACKSON: Yes.

MR. BURNS: Good evening.

I just first want to regress to Winsome and

Terrence talking about the need for new buses. As you know,

about three or four years ago we consolidated both services

between Parks and Community Center, and it's been working

very, very well. However, we do have an aging fleet of

buses. And I would even say in addition to the buses that

To consider an agreement between the Town of Greenburgh and the Village of Hastings-on-Hudson for fire protection services to Uninorporated Greenburgh residents of the Donald Park Fire Protection District for the year 2017, at a cost not to exceed $334,019.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: The last public hearing, since

there is an agreement between the Town of Greenburgh and the

Village of Hastings for fire protection, I'd like to move

that.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: To move to open the

hearing.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: I'd like to move that we open

the hearing.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Would anybody like to speak on

that?

MR. LEWIS: You should probably say what the

numbers are.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: This is a typical fire

protection district contract. This one happens to be for

the Donald Park Fire Protection District. We contract with

the Village of Hastings-on-Hudson to use their fire

department to service the needs of residents in the

incorporated area, and to provide them firefighting

services.

The sum this year is a slight decrease from last

year. Last year was $340,976. This year it is $334,019.

And that sum $334,019 is for the period of January 1, 2017,

through December 31, 2017. We're not behind. It's just

that's the way they do their contracts.

And so, a public hearing is required in order to

enter into this agreement, and that's why we're here

tonight.

Does anyone have anything they wish to say as part of the public hearing?

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Then I'd like to close the

hearing and leave the record open for seven days.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Second.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: All in favor?

COUNCILMAN JONES: Aye.

COUNCILWOMAN JUETTNER: Aye.

COUNCILMAN MORGAN: Aye.

COUNCILMAN SHEEHAN: Aye.

SUPERVISOR FEINER: Now we go to the public

comments.

(Whereupon, the public comment portion of the meeting took place, off the record.)

* * * * *

Certified to be a true and

accurate transcription of the

within proceedings.

SUSAN L. GIAMPICCOLO Senior Court Reporter

ATTORNEY – 989-1615

AT 1 - 6/27/18

Resolution of the Town Board of the Town of Greenburgh accepting the offer of dedication of a road in the right of way area on the property located at 300 Waterside Drive, Elmsford, NY (to be held over to July 11, 2018 Town Board meeting)

AT 2 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing tax certiorari settlement with petitioner Centro Heritage SPE for property located at 353 N. Cenral Park Avenue. The Town’s share of the refund is $149,600±; the County’s share is $89,160±; the Bronx Valley Sewer District’s share is $12,316±; the Greenburgh Central School District’s share is $377,339±; the Hartsdale Fire District’s share is $127,600±; the Consolidated Sewer Mtc. District’s share is $4,092±. Refunds from all sources total $760,108± (to be held over to July 11, 2018 Town Board Meeting)

AT 3 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the execution of a contract for Arts & Culture services with Sarah Bracey White, at a cost not to exceed $60,000 (to be held over to July 11, 2018, 2018 Town Board Meeting)

AT 4 - 6/27/18
Resolution authorizing the continued retention of the Law Firm of Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford, P.C., as special Counsel for the Town of Greenburgh regarding Federal litigation stemming from the Zoning classification of a property known as “One Dromore Road”, at a cost not to exceed $100,000

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

AT 5 - 6/27/18
Resolution authorizing the continued retention of Robert A. Spolzino, Esq. of Smith Buss & Jacobs, LLP in connection with the review and evaluation of a petition for village incorporation submitted by residents of the Edgemont section of the town, for an amount not to exceed $50,000

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CLERK – 989-1500

CL 1 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing closing of Sky Meadow Place, between Hillcrest Ave and Robert Lane on Saturday, September 8, 2018, from 2:30 PM to 8:30 PM, for a wedding ceremony and reception

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT – 989-1538

CD 1 - 6/27/18

Resolution endorsing the submission of an application for 2019 – 2021 Community Development Block Grant Funding for sidewalk installation along portions of Old Tarrytown Road, Knollwood Road, and Manhattan Avenue in the Town of Greenburgh

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

COMPTROLLER – 989-1603

CO 1 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $25,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the purchase and installation of equipment for a D.E.F. fueling station in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Francis Sheehan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 2 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $1,135,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the purchase of heavy duty equipment and vehicles for use by various town departments for construction and maintenance, in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 3 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $1,384,058 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the purchase of various electronic equipment for police communication systems, in for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 4 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $1,648,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the construction or reconstruction of curbing and sidewalks at various locations, in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 5 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $2,000,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the reconstruction of various town roads, in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Francis Sheehan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 6 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $68,200 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the purchase of passenger vehicles to replace similar vehicles in service at least three years, in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 7 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $85,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the partial reconstruction of various town buildings, in for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 8 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $93,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of replacement of boilers and heating equipment in various town buildings, in for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Francis Sheehan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 9 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $350,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the purchase of traffic signals as part of the Ardsley Road and Sprain Road intersection improvement, in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 10 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $405,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of improvements to ventilating and air conditioning equipment in various town buildings, in for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 11 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $431,300 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of improvements to various town parks, in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 12 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $459,878 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the purchase of equipment and software or other intangible capital assets for various town departments, in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Francis Sheehan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 13 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $480,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the purchase of waste management equipment, including a vehicle, for the automated collection program, in for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 14 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $600,000 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the partial reconstruction of the manor house at the Greenburgh Nature Center, in for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

CO 15 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the issuance of $89,200 bonds of the Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County, New York, to pay the cost of the installation of software and data updates for maintenance of assessment and tax rolls in and for said town

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PARKS & RECREATION – 693-8985

PR 1 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing award to lowest responsible bidder, Ramos Tree Service and Emerald Tree & Shrub Care, to provide for the pruning and/or removal of trees deemed unsafe in various Town parks by the Department of Parks and Recreation's Arborist and the Town's Forester, at a cost not to exceed $58,000

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PR 2 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the execution of a $124,991.00 grant agreement between the Town of Greenburgh and the County of Westchester and the Town of Mt. Pleasant to provide site and home delivered meals

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PR 3 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the execution of a $9,304.00 grant agreement between the Town of Greenburgh and the county of Westchester for transporting seniors

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PHILANTHROPY – 989-1515

PH 1 - 6/27/18
Resolution endorsing the submission of an application for 2019 - 2021 Community Development Block Grant Funding for a 30 Seat ADA-Compatible Passenger Bus for seniors and youths at the Theodore D. Young Community Center

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PH 2 - 6/27/18
Resolution endorsing the submission of an application for 2019 -2021 Community Development Block Grant Funding for the Greenburgh Parks and Recreation Kiddyland Playground replacement at Washington Avenue Park

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PH 3 - 6/27/18
Resolution endorsing the submission of an application for 2019 - 2021 Community Development Block Grant Funding for the replacement of the upstairs lockers and upgrade of the upstairs locker room at the Theodore D. Young Community Center

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PH 4 - 6/27/18
Resolution endorsing the submission of applications for Fiscal Years 2019-2021 Community Development Block Grant funding to Westchester County for non-profit organization projects

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PUBLIC WORKS - 989-1575

PW 1 - 6/27/18

Resolution approving the continued professional services with PCI (Professional Consulting Inc., LLC..) for construction support services for the water main infrastructure improvement project along Chelsea Rd., Plymouth Rd., Arthur Ln., and a portion of Mayfair Way, not to exceed an additional $26,800

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Kevin Morgan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

PW 2 - 6/27/18

Resolution approving the continued professional services with Woodard & Curran Engineering, PA, PC for construction inspection services specific to environmental remediation activities at 715 Dobbs Ferry Road

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

THEODORE D. YOUNG COMMUNITY CENTER – 989-3600

TY 1 - 6/27/18

Resolution accepting on behalf of the Department of Community Resources a donation from the Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. in the amount of $1,000.00 to help support programs at the Theodore D. Young Community Center

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Francis Sheehan

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

TY 2 - 6/27/18

Resolution authorizing the Town Supervisor to enter into a contract with recording artist Darien Dean and NIA Music Distribution LLC., to provide music and entertainment at the William L. Carter Summer Jazz Concert Series at the Department of Community Resources, Theodore D. Young Community Center on July 12, 2018, at a cost not to exceed $4,000

Moved by Supervisor Paul J. Feiner, seconded by Councilman Ken Jones

AYE:	Supervisor Paul J. Feiner
	Councilwoman Diana D. Juettner
	Councilman Francis Sheehan
	Councilman Kevin Morgan
	Councilman Ken Jones
Motion Adopted

Return
Town Clerk’s Office Town of Greenburgh
June 27, 2018
Draft A Meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Greenburgh was held in the Meeting Room, Greenburgh Town Hall, 177 Hillside Avenue, Greenburgh, New York 10607, at 7:30 PM, Wednesday, June 27, 2018